May 01, 2008
Sartorial Disagreement

Question: should Converse plimsolls be retired when they have holes in their sides? I think so, and I'm the one with big holes in my shoes. Even according to my loose standards, I feel I'm looking a bit vagrant. Matt, on the other hand, thinks that Converse are supposed to look beaten up; the worse the condition, the better.

We should Ask Hadley...

Posted to Apropos of nothing by Simon Brunning at May 01, 2008 01:48 PM
Comments

Yep, you cannot do the "indie kid shuffle" dance at a gig with shiny new converse.

Posted by: moschops on May 1, 2008 03:19 PM

Matts right, they have to look like they've suffered

Posted by: elp on May 1, 2008 05:44 PM

My white ones don't look battered and that's how I like them but my khaki ones look better weathered.

Posted by: tulna on May 7, 2008 10:00 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:



Comments:


Remember info?