My results: You are a casual weblogger. You only blog when you have nothing better to do, which is not very often. There's nothing wrong with that. But if you'd post a little more often, you'd make your readers very happy.
Utter bollocks, obviously. ;-)
Via Erik.
Posted to Blogs by Simon Brunning at January 05, 2004 11:56 AMjez 60/100: You are a dedicated weblogger. You post frequently because you enjoy weblogging a lot, yet you still manage to have a social life. You're the best kind of weblogger. Way to go!
Posted by: jez on January 5, 2004 12:11 PM...I got 56 and the same comment as jez :^)...
Posted by: billy on January 5, 2004 12:22 PMA lowly 36 / 100. "You are a casual weblogger. You only blog when you have nothing better to do, which is not very often. There's nothing wrong with that. But if you'd post a little more often, you'd make your readers very happy."
Either I need to blog more or I'm too self deprecating...
Posted by: sam on January 5, 2004 01:06 PM56 here too! Woohoo!
Posted by: Anthony Eden on January 5, 2004 01:46 PMI managed a measly 24, but I have only been at it (blogging that is) for a little while. A casual blogger I am then.
Posted by: Lee on January 5, 2004 02:20 PM36 for me but I've only been going for a short time - and most people I know, computer literate or not, haven't a clue what a blog is.
Posted by: Sujatin on January 5, 2004 02:30 PMOops - I'd better not swear so much if my mum is reading...
;-)
Posted by: Simon Brunning on January 5, 2004 02:42 PM